Was school designed to make children obedient?
Compulsory schooling began in 1760s Prussia as a tool of royal authority. What that history explains, what it doesn't, and what the evidence says works.
The research says yes. Smacking doesn't make children behave better over time, and it predicts more behaviour problems and poorer mental health later. It's still legal for parents everywhere in Australia.
The Australian Child Maltreatment Study surveyed 8,503 Australians aged 16 and over, chosen at random to represent the country. It asked about corporal punishment: being hit for discipline, enough to hurt but not to injure.
So this isn't about a small group of harsh families. It describes most Australian adults.
Two large reviews carry most of the weight.
In 2016, Elizabeth Gershoff and Andrew Grogan-Kaylor pooled five decades of studies covering 160,927 children, and looked only at ordinary spanking: an open-handed smack on the bottom or limbs, not beatings. Spanking was linked to 13 of the 17 outcomes they tested, and every link pointed the harmful way: more aggression, more antisocial behaviour, more mental health problems, and a worse relationship with parents. None of the outcomes improved. Adults who were spanked more often as children were more likely to show antisocial behaviour and mental health problems.
In 2021, Anja Heilmann and colleagues reviewed 69 studies that followed children over time. That design matters: it shows whether smacking comes before the problems, not only alongside them. Physical punishment consistently predicted increases in behaviour problems over time. It didn't predict better behaviour or any other good outcome.
This is the fair objection. Children who get smacked are more likely to live with stress, money trouble or other kinds of harm, so maybe those things, not the smacking, cause the damage.
Researchers have tested it several ways:
No single study proves cause, and no ethics board would let researchers assign children to be hit. But every kind of evidence points the same way, and none points towards benefit.
Every Australian state and territory still lets parents use "reasonable" physical punishment. The defence comes from common law in Victoria and the ACT, and from criminal codes elsewhere. New South Wales goes furthest: force to a child's head or neck, or force that causes harm lasting more than a short time, is not reasonable. That limits the defence. It doesn't remove it.
Seventy countries have banned all physical punishment of children, including Sweden (the first, in 1979), New Zealand, Scotland and Wales. In 2025 a South Australian royal commission recommended a ban, and the Queensland Law Reform Commission has reviewed the state's defence. At the time of writing, no Australian parliament has passed one.
The same research that finds harm from smacking also finds what helps. Parenting approaches with good evidence behind them share a few habits:
Free, evidence-based parenting guides and courses are available through the Australian Government-funded Raising Children Network, and many states offer free parenting programs.
If you were smacked as a child, you're in the majority, and the research isn't a judgement of your parents. It's a reason to choose differently, now that we know more.
Compulsory schooling began in 1760s Prussia as a tool of royal authority. What that history explains, what it doesn't, and what the evidence says works.
Climbing high, going fast, play fighting. The research says children who take small risks in play move more, get along better and are no more injured.
Teen distress rose sharply after 2010, as phones spread. What the research shows, where scientists disagree, and what parents can act on now.